Results
The numbers compound too.
Four programs. Different industries, same model. Find the one that sounds like your situation — the data behind each result is sourced from Google Search Console, 90-day comparison periods.
Engagements
B2B SaaS
A 340-person B2B SaaS company expanding into competitive enterprise search terms after years of relying on paid acquisition.
The company had strong brand recognition but near-zero organic presence in their target query clusters. Technical debt and a shallow content architecture had prevented compounding from beginning.
14 monthsRegional Services
A multi-location regional services brand with 12 locations competing against national aggregators for high-intent local queries.
National aggregators dominated the SERPs through domain authority and content volume. The program identified query clusters where local intent signals outweigh domain authority — and built into those gaps first.
11 monthsE-commerce
A DTC e-commerce brand in a saturated vertical requiring full technical overhaul before content architecture could compound.
The site had accumulated four years of technical debt: duplicate product pages, missing canonical signals, and a crawl budget consumed by low-value paginated URLs. Technical remediation was complete before a single content asset was built.
18 monthsProfessional Services
A professional services firm targeting a narrow, high-value query cluster with low volume but exceptional conversion intent.
The target query set was small — fewer than 400 monthly searches — but each conversion carried significant revenue. The program focused entirely on SERP feature capture and entity authority rather than traffic volume.
9 monthsAll engagements anonymized. Results reflect real client data.
Performance varies by market, baseline, and program duration.